Comments on: Cervical Cancer Jab & SEO http://rob-hammond.co.uk/cervical-cancer-jab SEO, Perl, etc Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:43:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: rob http://rob-hammond.co.uk/cervical-cancer-jab/comment-page-1#comment-785 rob Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:02:03 +0000 http://rob-hammond.co.uk/?p=189#comment-785 To be fair to the NHS it appears they have been <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/cervical-cancer-jab-google-fuels-fears/#comment-4979">at least monitoring the SEO aspects</a> around this issue. However, linking to other (more accurate) news sources about the <a href="http://itn.co.uk/5d070881c3820b6c0412305daf076d73.html">cervical cancer jab</a> may also help to dislodge the Mail's dominance on this. To be fair to the NHS it appears they have been at least monitoring the SEO aspects around this issue.

However, linking to other (more accurate) news sources about the cervical cancer jab may also help to dislodge the Mail’s dominance on this.

]]> By: Tom hallett http://rob-hammond.co.uk/cervical-cancer-jab/comment-page-1#comment-782 Tom hallett Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:42:20 +0000 http://rob-hammond.co.uk/?p=189#comment-782 "It’s worth noting that the Mail’s misinformation is directly wasting taxpayer’s money by forcing the NHS to buy Google AdWords to put across the facts." Or... the NHS is wasting taxpayer's money by not looking at SEO as part of their overall marketing strategy. “It’s worth noting that the Mail’s misinformation is directly wasting taxpayer’s money by forcing the NHS to buy Google AdWords to put across the facts.”

Or… the NHS is wasting taxpayer’s money by not looking at SEO as part of their overall marketing strategy.

]]>